[67696] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Bligh)
Tue Feb 17 17:24:03 2004
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:20:53 +0000
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: "Chen, Weijing" <Weijing_Chen@labs.sbc.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <905A1C4ABF353F4C8CC16FA9F53DD0D6322A29@trimail2>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--On 17 February 2004 16:10 -0600 "Chen, Weijing"
<Weijing_Chen@labs.sbc.com> wrote:
> Sound like an any to any end to end signaling/control mechanism with
> authentication capabilities. Smell fishy (packet version of dial tone?)
Since when had dialtone got end-to-end signalling/control? My POTS line
doesn't run C7/SS7. I mean authentication as in scp (and not tftp). IE
one end user authorizes the other end user, using whatever credentials
they like.
Alex
