[67744] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Clueless service restrictions (was RE: Anti-spam System Idea)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 19 10:21:20 2004

To: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:41:37 +0700."
             <20040219044251.DD6715DEAC@segue.merit.edu> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:45 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


--==_Exmh_-2042955825P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:41:37 +0700, "Dr. Jeffrey Race" said:

> The identities of chronically mal-administered systems are well
> know.
> 
> There are some practical implementation problems at the margin but
> for (I am guessing) 95% of the cases, it is trivially easy.

So we're left with the conclusion that the fact there's a problem at all
indicates that there's a massive failure at the ISP level. It's either failure
of will, or failure of clue - though I suspect the former.

What *real* incentive is there for an ISP to take action?  I mean, we all
*know* that support is usually a money sink, and nobody wants to turn off a
paying customer and then have to spend the time talking them through fixing the
problem.  So if you're finding that your T-3 is finally full, and it's all spam
and P2P file sharing, you have to ask which costs more, actually dealing with
the problem users (and possibly scaring them off to a competitor), or just
biting the bullet and getting an OC3.

Other than the fear of a forklift upgrade of infrastructure, the only other
thing that currently works to motivate most ISPs is public derision on NANOG,
blacklisting, and anything else that is the equivalent of a swat across the
nose with a rolled up newspaper and a stern "Bad Puppy. You pooped on the
carpet, no doggie treat for you".


--==_Exmh_-2042955825P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFANNRNcC3lWbTT17ARAiw4AKCbJn4uxlMbcKLa3Ny6Atfm9vNGxwCcDhJY
kkiYnOHI16rSteenPzOqrQk=
=GAUo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-2042955825P--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post