[65443] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Osborne)
Tue Nov 25 18:26:48 2003
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:26:08 -0500
From: Eric Osborne <eosborne@cisco.com>
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
Cc: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>,
joshua sahala <joshua.ej.smith@usa.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0311251815520.2712-100000@TEMPEST.hq.nac.net>; from alex@nac.net on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:16:43PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:16:43PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
>
> > In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add
> > all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a
> > nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuits
> > properly due to whatever brokeass vendor you're using. :)
>
>
> ... which doesn't take into account distance.
>
....or in-cloud replication (IP multicast, L2 multicast).
eric
> Assume for a moment you sell a customer a port in Newark, NYC, and London.
>
> Clearly, a bit from nyc to newark should be priced differently than one
> from nyc to london.
>
> Agreed?
>
>
