[65442] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Tue Nov 25 18:17:51 2003
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:16:43 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: joshua sahala <joshua.ej.smith@usa.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20031125215619.GC82121@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> In a working transport system, what goes in must come out. So, if you add
> all the ports in a common direction (in or out), you'll at least get a
> nice aggregate even if you can't measure individual virtual circuits
> properly due to whatever brokeass vendor you're using. :)
... which doesn't take into account distance.
Assume for a moment you sell a customer a port in Newark, NYC, and London.
Clearly, a bit from nyc to newark should be priced differently than one
from nyc to london.
Agreed?
