[64479] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NOAA warning for rf communications
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Granados)
Fri Oct 24 12:32:16 2003
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Granados <scott@wworks.net>
To: Roy <garlic@garlic.com>
Cc: Chris Yarnell <cdy@kooks.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3F98C8F3.6020702@garlic.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Wouldn't 2.4 ghz fall in that range or does hf mean hf in the classical
sense of something on the scale of 3 to 49 mhz or so.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Roy wrote:
>
> According to the notice
>
> "Satellite and other spacecraft operations, power systems, high
> frequency communications, and navigation systems may experience
> disruptions over this two-week period."
>
> I think you will find that 802.11b and other terrestrial microwave LOS
> links don't meet any of those criteria and should be unaffected. Some
> small increase in the noise level may be detected.
>
> Chris Yarnell wrote:
>
> > my office experienced 802.11b weirdness (sudden bouts of 0% signal for no
> > apparent reason) earlier this week. i'm fully expecting more tomorrow. :)
> >
> >
> >>There is a high likelihood that things like 802.11, licensed and
> >>unlicensed microwave links, and certainly satellite links will sustain
> >>interference over the next few days. I assume that everyone on the list
> >>is both aware, and prepared ;-)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
