[64339] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Welty)
Mon Oct 20 17:06:43 2003
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20031020203145.51CFD7B43@berkshire.research.att.com>
Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:31:45 -0400 "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> wrote:
> A number of people havce responded that they don't want to be forced to
> pay for a change that will benefit Verisign. That's a policy issue I'm
> trying to avoid here. I'm looking for pure technical answers -- how
> much lead time do you need to make such changes safely?
may i suggest another operational issue then?
how does verisign plan to identify and notify all affected parties when changes
are proposed?
for example, in the current case, how do they plan to identify every party running
postfix and inform them that they need to upgrade their MTA?
this seems non-trivial to me.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
