[64322] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re[2]: data request on Sitefinder

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Welty)
Mon Oct 20 14:16:50 2003

Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:13:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <p06100363bbb9c7df3bce@[192.168.1.104]>
Reply-To: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:31:41 -0400 Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com> wrote:
> More importantly--Verisign needs to deploy alternate servers so it's 
> actually possible to test software against the changes they propose 
> to make.  Otherwise we're just running around guessing what the 
> behavior is going to be.
 
> But fundamentally the problem is this.  

i maintain that there is a different problem that is fundamental.

Verisign is clearly expecting the operations community to incur costs so
that they can make their (estimated) $100M a year. what's wrong with this
picture?

richard
-- 
Richard Welty                                         rwelty@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
    Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post