[60127] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Just a quick thought...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Fri Aug 1 12:00:01 2003
From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: <jeyers@sloancc.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:59:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200308011453.h71ErHe27365@karoshi.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> intellectual property issues? the IETF could not get change control
> on V8? :)
Vroooooooooooom <grin>
But ford has a /8 in IPv4 so they surely would like it if the protocol
carried their name too :)
> > I haven't had time to look, but just for my clarification,
> > why was IPv8 not pursued further. I remember there was a discussion on
IPv6
> > vs IPv8 and the argument to go directly to IPv8 instead, but I had to
drop
> > out from following the discussions since.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers :
8 PIP The P Internet Protocol [PXF]
eg:
http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/ipng/ian.pip.html
http://free.vlsm.org/v01/internet/ietf/00/0019.txt
and more if you google around...
Greets,
Jeroen
PS: Nooo... IPv8 and IPv16 mentioned by a certain person have
nothing to do with it, even better there is no spec of those :)
