[60125] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Just a quick thought...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Fri Aug 1 10:50:38 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: jeyers@sloancc.net
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu (nanog@merit.edu)
In-Reply-To: <3F2A76C5.000005.00472@minimite> from "Jerry Eyers" at Aug 01, 2003 10:18:45 AM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
intellectual property issues? the IETF could not get change control
on V8? :)
>
>
> I haven't had time to look, but just for my clarification, why was IPv8 not
> pursued further. I remember there was a discussion on IPv6 vs IPv8 and the
> argument to go directly to IPv8 instead, but I had to drop out from
> following the discussions since.
>
> Anyone remember the outcome? It seems obvious IPv6 won, but I am curious as
> to why...
>
> Jerry
>
> jeyers@rebma.com
>
