[59850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The status of consumer rate limiting?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mans Nilsson)
Wed Jul 23 02:08:09 2003
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:07:27 +0200
From: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@sunet.se>
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
Cc: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@gwi.net>,
"Owings, Curtis L [GMG]" <curtis.l.owings@mail.sprint.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307230138500.6986-100000@MrServer>
X-synced-from: Pilsnet
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--7OjtA+nCOeniMjk8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: The status of consumer rate limiting? Date: Wed, Jul 23, 2003 =
at 01:40:20AM +0100 Quoting Stephen J. Wilcox (steve@telecomplete.co.uk):
>=20
> Since some p2p programs now use well known port numbers allocated to othe=
r=20
> things eg port 80, is it even possible to block/rate limit them? And have=
folks=20
> attempts at blocking caused this move to use such port numbers which imho=
is not=20
> a good thing..
I'm still waiting for a P2P system running inside IPsec. With XP
and W2k making inroads on consumer computers there now is a significant
user base with access to luser-friendly systems carrying these
capabilities.
--=20
M=E5ns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC
MN1334-RIPE
He probably just wants to take over my CELLS and then EXPLODE inside me
like a BARREL of runny CHOPPED LIVER! Or maybe he'd like to
PSYCHOLIGICALLY TERRORISE ME until I have no objection to a RIGHT-WING
MILITARY TAKEOVER of my apartment!! I guess I should call AL PACINO!
--7OjtA+nCOeniMjk8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/HiYf02/pMZDM1cURAo9FAKCl/kgaZeBmi9ULYvEAjTrcKZTs6wCfT0CK
uXL2IA+BQqFEGMfMlIFqTdA=
=IK1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7OjtA+nCOeniMjk8--
