[59271] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ISPs are asked to block yet another port

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Kell)
Mon Jun 23 03:16:24 2003

Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 02:58:56 -0400
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>
To: nanog list <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


The description by LURHQ is misleading.  Messenger is an RPC service. 
Typical pop-up spammers queried 135 (Windows RPC portmapper) to find the 
port number of the messenger service, then send the message to that 
port.  It turns out that messenger can "typically" be found on 1026.

And as was noted earlier, unconditionally blocking udp/1026 will cause
a lot of collateral damage when udp/1026 outbound is used as an 
ephemeral port for a legitimate UDP-based service (DNS, NTP, etc).

Jeff


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post