[59242] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IRR/RADB and BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ejay Hire)
Fri Jun 20 11:53:03 2003
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:49:00 -0500
From: "Ejay Hire" <ejay.hire@isdn.net>
To: <deepak@ai.net>, "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>,
"Vandy Hamidi" <vandy.hamidi@markettools.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Negative.
-Ejay
-----Original Message-----
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:deepak@ai.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:43 PM
To: Kevin Oberman; Vandy Hamidi
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: IRR/RADB and BGP=20
> I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the =
peering
> agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
> this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
> were properly registered, securing the Internet would be a lot closer
> to being possible.
Is it safe to assume (now) that all the routes one would care to listen =
to
(under normal circumstances)
are registered in an IRR now? I remember there used to be well-known =
issues
with some networks, especially internationally.
Deepak Jain
AiNET
