[59238] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: IRR/RADB and BGP

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Fri Jun 20 00:44:09 2003

Reply-To: <deepak@ai.net>
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@ai.net>
To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>,
	"Vandy Hamidi" <vandy.hamidi@markettools.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:43:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20030619224648.3E23E5D04@ptavv.es.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> I strongly approve of such requirement. I know that it is in the peering
> agreements of several carriers, but they often don't check or enforce
> this. Many register customer routes and ASes. If routes and policies
> were properly registered, securing the Internet would be a lot closer
> to being possible.

Is it safe to assume (now) that all the routes one would care to listen to
(under normal circumstances)
are registered in an IRR now? I remember there used to be well-known issues
with some networks, especially internationally.

Deepak Jain
AiNET


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post