[57303] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Abuse.cc ???
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Johannes Ullrich)
Thu Apr 3 10:19:15 2003
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:17:06 -0500
From: "Johannes Ullrich" <jullrich@euclidian.com>
To: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>, nanog@merit.edu
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jullrich@euclidian.com via server.euclidian.com
In-Reply-To: <390E55B947E7C848898AEBB9E507706041E630@msmdcfs01.msmgmt.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:05:55 -0500
"McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com> wrote:
> I just made a number of abuse complaints to a provider and then after contacting the abuse #.
> I got told that they don't use abuse@ anymore. that abuse.cc is the new email address.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this against RFC current practice?
hm. send the RFC police after them :-/... fact is that there are plenty
of domains that do not even have an abuse@ e-mail address. Never mind
the once that don't accept any abuse/security related e-mail and instead
direct you to a web form.
(personal favorite: mail bouncing from abuse@ due to mailbox full)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
jullrich@euclidian.com Collaborative Intrusion Detection
join http://www.dshield.org
