[57173] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Sun Mar 30 17:22:39 2003
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 17:21:00 -0500
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "William Devine, II" <william@smartguys.net>,
"Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>,
"Rafi Sadowsky" <rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I am not for or against either..
just putting thoughts out there..
NANOG-Legal would be a good thing for the legal eagles,
and a more consuming one for those of us already on numerous lists..
all in all, NANOG as a whole single list usually inspires more=20
information sharing when taken whole, IMHO....
Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Devine, II [mailto:william@smartguys.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 5:15 PM
> To: McBurnett, Jim; 'Jack Bates'; 'Rafi Sadowsky'
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why
> not nanog-legal ?)
>=20
>=20
> Why not a nanog-legal list ?
>=20
> wiliam
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> McBurnett, Jim
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 01:47 PM
> To: Jack Bates; Rafi Sadowsky
> Cc: Jared Mauch; todd glassey; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I agree...Partially
> Legal issues are important, but those below a
> management level, mostly don't care..
> I would not necessarily want another list to watch..
> But, it sometimes get's overly consuming to look at topics I care less
> about...
>=20
> anyway, that's my 10 cents worth.. Inflation ya know..
>=20
> Jim
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates@brightok.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:41 PM
> > To: Rafi Sadowsky
> > Cc: Jared Mauch; todd glassey; nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
> >
> >
> >
> > Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
> > >
> > > Whats wrong with the nanog-offtopic list ?
> > >
> >
> > The legal issues are technical on-topic and nanog related. However,
> > there are some that want to know what's going on in the=20
> legal system,
> > and others that don't. At the same time, those wanting to
> > keep track of
> > legal issues may not want to be subscribed to nanog-offtopic.
> >
> > -Jack
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
