[57159] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (todd glassey)
Sun Mar 30 14:05:37 2003
From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:04:07 -0800
In-Reply-To: <3E87306A.1050807@brightok.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
That's why we need separate lists for them. This is a real
issue though and its important to the global operations of
the bigger picture Internet -
besides this is ***the*** golden opportunity for you ISP's
to hit your customers for more money since you now have
serious legal issues constraining how you architect your
business.
Todd
-->-----Original Message-----
-->From: owner-nanog@merit.edu
-->[mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
-->Jack Bates
-->Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:59 AM
-->To: nanog@merit.edu
-->Subject: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State
-->Super-DMCA Too True)
-->
-->
-->
-->todd glassey wrote:
-->> Actually I proposed that NANOG also consider several
-->> splinter lists. Including one concerned with the Legal
-->> Issues with operating network services, and
-->since there are
-->> jail terms being talked about I suggest that
-->these are now
-->> sub-organizations who's time as come.
-->>
-->
-->I completely agree, Todd. I think that the legal
-->aspects are relevant to
-->NANOG, but there are some who feel that it is
-->excess in their mailbox
-->and deters them from the technical aspects of networking.
-->
-->-Jack
-->
-->
