[57163] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Sun Mar 30 14:49:41 2003
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:47:17 -0500
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>,
"Rafi Sadowsky" <rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il>
Cc: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.Nether.net>,
"todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I agree...Partially
Legal issues are important, but those below a=20
management level, mostly don't care..
I would not necessarily want another list to watch..
But, it sometimes get's overly consuming to look at topics I care less =
about...
anyway, that's my 10 cents worth.. Inflation ya know..
Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates@brightok.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:41 PM
> To: Rafi Sadowsky
> Cc: Jared Mauch; todd glassey; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
> >=20
> > Whats wrong with the nanog-offtopic list ?
> >=20
>=20
> The legal issues are technical on-topic and nanog related. However,=20
> there are some that want to know what's going on in the legal system,=20
> and others that don't. At the same time, those wanting to=20
> keep track of=20
> legal issues may not want to be subscribed to nanog-offtopic.
>=20
> -Jack
>=20
>=20
>=20
