|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:53:37 -0600 From: "Pete Templin" <pete.templin@texlink.com> To: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@multicasttech.com>, <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu -----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme@multicasttech.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:58 PM To: David G. Andersen Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... BTW, when I did VLBI for the Navy, we used to move literally tons of tapes around the world per month and achieved sustained bandwidths > 1 Gbps, albeit with FED-EX, not routers. Does this take into account the delay from encapsulating the tapes into = a FED-EX packet and assigning the appropriate layer 1 header, then the = queueing delays experienced while awaiting an open buffer on the next = FED-EX truck? Pete Templin IP Network Engineer TexLink Communications (210) 892-4183 pete.templin@texlink.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |