[56500] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practic
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cutler, James R)
Mon Mar 10 09:15:38 2003
From: "Cutler, James R" <james.cutler@eds.com>
To: "'Peter Galbavy'" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>,
"Dr. Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:11:31 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
"Well-managed.......profitably....." leaves out a lot of companies.
Also
>>is there a forthcoming section on criterium for demonstrating
>>reformation by the sp and/or 'offending' user?
>
>The criterion is stated: no more complaints
Implies that a simple "j'accuse" is enough to create a denial of service. I
prefer the US to Napoleonic codes, where an accusation is insufficient to
prove guilt.
-
James R. Cutler, EDS
800 Tower Drive, Troy, MI 48098
248-265-7514
james.cutler@eds.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Galbavy [mailto:peter.galbavy@knowtion.net]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:06 AM
To: Dr. Jeffrey Race
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice
(please comment)
quote:
> Well-managed, ethical members of the internet industry already conduct
> their businesses, successfully and profitably, according to the
> principles specified in the Practice. The proposed Practice simply
> aims to raise the entire industry to the level of today's best
> players.
I object to this wording; even without reading *any* other part of your
document, I am already very cautious about it's contents simply because of
the implication of your statement above. This is very much one of those
political "you're either with us or against us" declarations.
So - if you don't so it 'our way' then you must be unethical and
badly-managed. At least.
Peter
