[5500] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pritish Shah)
Mon Oct 21 18:35:11 1996
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:11:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pritish Shah <pritish@iocenter.net>
To: edd@acm.org
cc: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>, alex@relcom.eu.net, nanog@merit.edu,
paul@vix.com
In-Reply-To: <199610211346.RAA19513@aic.net>
ok so livingstons are easy to configure.. but are they easy to
REconfigure?? NOPE!! Is it easy to take a look at the entire configuration
at one glance??? NOPE!!
If your livingston were to go down and you needed a new livingston, start
praying to god. Miss one detail and you are still dead.
Pritish
On Mon, 21 Oct 1996 edd@acm.org wrote:
> > Bay is not. Proteon is not. Gated (for me, so far) is not.
> > Microrouters are not. Morningstars are/(?were?). Livingstons
> > are not.
>
> Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...
>
> > > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
> >
> > I can only speak for myself, of course.
>
> Me too,
>
>
> Ed
>
>
