[51586] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: AT&T NYC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Fri Aug 30 08:53:57 2002
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: <alex@yuriev.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10208300823530.6545-100000@s1.yuriev.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 alex@yuriev.com wrote:
> > I would definately not recommend route reflection or a confederation in a
> > network with such a small number of BGP routers:
> In spirit of the above, I suggest you also do not have maintenance window,
> forget about re-checking configs, enable to do the simpliest commands, and
> of course let everyone try debugging any problems by typing random commands
> into your routers. After all, your network consists of only 4 routers.
Ok, but how is _not_ using route reflection or a confederation similar to
the above???
Iljitsch
