[51185] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gary E. Miller)
Wed Aug 21 18:10:08 2002
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com>
To: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor@inoc.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <000d01c24952$5010a810$6f00000a@z0.inoc.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yo Robert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> But mail servers need static IP's, and network operators must know about
> those customers that need static addresses and if there is a mail server
> on the end of it.
Uh, no. I have seen spammers use dynamic DNS to use throw away
dial-ups accounts for incoming main service.
How about moving this to an approriate forum where people really know
spam and mail? Nanog is for moving packets. Nanog does not usually
care what is in the packet unless it is a routing protocol.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
