[51269] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JC Dill)
Thu Aug 22 12:23:53 2002
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:19:56 -0700
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
From: JC Dill <nanog@vo.cnchost.com>
In-Reply-To: <001001c24968$611815b0$030010ac@void>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 04:13 PM 8/21/02, Robert Blayzor wrote:
>
>> Uh, no. I have seen spammers use dynamic DNS to use throw
>> away dial-ups accounts for incoming main service.
>
>Right, but to run a "real mail server" you need a static address. Which
>can be registered as a valid mail server. Dynamic IP's cannot.
>
>> How about moving this to an approriate forum where people
>> really know spam and mail? Nanog is for moving packets.
>> Nanog does not usually care what is in the packet unless it
>> is a routing protocol.
>
>"The NANOG mailing list is established to provide a forum for the
>exchange of technical information and the discussion of specific
>implementation issues that require cooperation among network service
>providers. In order to continue to provide a useful forum for discussion
>of relevant technical issues, the list is governed by the following
>guidelines: "
>
>...
>
>Doesn't mention anything about "Nanog is for moving packets".
*yet*
The FAQ is a work in progress. Expect to see the "moving packets" phrase
added Real Soon Now.
jc
