[51147] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Rosenman)
Wed Aug 21 16:09:42 2002

From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
To: Robert Blayzor <rblayzor@inoc.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <000701c2494c$11d6ff00$6f00000a@z0.inoc.net>
Date: 21 Aug 2002 14:57:04 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 14:50, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> > What about individuals that run their own mail servers?  (E.G. me).? 
> 
> Get your mail server registered just like everyone else I suppose.  If
> your address space is not registered to you directly, your ISP would
> have to do this for you.  You're ISP would then handle any complaints
> (if any) from the registrar and coordinate it with you directly.  I
> honestly like that idea because as a network operator, I like to know
> what customers are running mail servers on our network, where they are,
> and who owns them.
Actually, it's swip'ed to me (I work for said ISP), but I also run a
SMTP server on my laptop which bounces usually between two addresses
(one at home, one at work), and I suppose that the work address (NOT
swip'ed) would have a problem under this proposal. 

I DO understand the reasoning, but it is a **BIG** culture change, and
would take a year or two or more to implement network wide. 

I think $100/year is STEEP, if it is PER SERVER, but per
COMPANY/INDIVIDUAL it **might** be acceptable. 

(I have 3 boxes + the laptop that do SMTP regularly). 

Ideas given this? 

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post