[50656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Rothschild)
Tue Aug 6 17:01:45 2002
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:00:29 -0400
From: Adam Rothschild <asr@asr.org>
To: Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/zNkI7d3EEmn3+v5DgN/l8KAAAAQAAAAjLc9Q8rjJkuLQ8aVIRm86AEAAAAA@isprime.com>; from pr@isprime.com on Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 02:12:41PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 2002-08-06-14:12:41, Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com> wrote:
> I only have 10 /24's that are absolutely mission critical to keep
> up.
...and this necessitates cluttering the IRR with 10 /24 entries, how?
A number of upstreams who prefix-filter based on IRR are cool with the
'le' and 'ge' directives, e.g. so you could register just one object
for your aggregate, and announce anything /24 or less specific.
-a
--
"I'm not known to be the best googler."
--Jane Pawlukiewicz <pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com>
