[50486] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: redundancy [was: something about arrogance]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Evans)
Tue Jul 30 19:01:55 2002
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:33 +0100 (BST)
From: Patrick Evans <pre@PRE.ORG>
To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020730100213.AAA16158@shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, David Schwartz wrote:
> One more just for kicks. Client had a 100Mbps circuit from their sole
> provider (100Mbps to colocated router, DS3 from this router to their
> premises). The circuit had been in place for several years and the contract
> had long since expired. One day, they got a call
Er, what does due diligence mean to you?
(We're waaaay into no-shit-sherlock territory here)
(For the record, I'd consider any operation without an AS number a
startup, and my first project, if network availability were a key
issue, within any organisation would be to a) obtain one and b) make
use of it. YMMV, but some V are more equal then others. Particularly
in the current economic climate.)
--
Patrick Evans, allegedly
Email: pre@pre.org
CV: www.pre.org/pre/cv
Wheels: Kawasaki ZXR400L9
