[50484] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: redundancy [was: something about arrogance]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Knowles)
Tue Jul 30 18:06:59 2002
In-Reply-To: <008901c237ed$e362b930$5201a8c0@server>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:29:31 +0200
To: "Derek Samford" <dsamford@fastduck.net>, <pr@isprime.com>,
"'Pedro R Marques'" <roque@sbcglobal.net>, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 1:23 PM -0400 2002/07/30, Derek Samford wrote:
> At the same time, I've been able to maintain aggregation of all
> of my routes, and maintain true stability in my network. There is
> absolutely no excuse to fill up the routing tables with nonsense.
Seeing as I don't understand much about this process, I would
love to hear a detailed explanation of how you have managed to do all
this.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
