[50430] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Any people still with old filters?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralph Doncaster)
Mon Jul 29 12:47:56 2002

Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:47:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1067670000.1027935797@laptop.kurtis.pp.se>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> ...and the clue-less on the Internet is (still) less than 80%. It's more 
> like 20%. See http://mcvax.org/~jhma/routing for one example of how much we 
> could gain if we actually aggregated...

This was hinted at in the peering debate, but wouldn't it help the cause
of aggregation if networks stopped requiring a large number of prefixes in
order to establish peering?

-Ralph



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post