[50426] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Any people still with old filters?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Mon Jul 29 05:44:27 2002
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:43:17 +0200
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Reply-To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
To: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/zNkI7d3EEmn3+v5DgN/l8KAAAAQAAAAgUL1BqOeOk2NMSicx0XUHgEAAAAA@isprime.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> No.
> If they did, 80% of the internet would not be visible to them today.,
sure. and pigs fly.
I don't think that anyone have ever filtered on old class-based sizes. What
I know is that the most restrictive filters have been on RIR allocations
boundaries, and for old "non-returned" A:s and B:s there have bene filters
on /8 and /16. Swamp space have never been filtered.
...and the clue-less on the Internet is (still) less than 80%. It's more
like 20%. See http://mcvax.org/~jhma/routing for one example of how much we
could gain if we actually aggregated...
- kurtis -
