[50190] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Requirement to store email for 90 days.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Senie)
Mon Jul 22 13:06:24 2002
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:02:54 -0400
To: John Fraizer <tvo@EnterZone.Net>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0207221213230.1706-100000@Overkill.EnterZone
.Net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 12:17 PM 7/22/2002, John Fraizer wrote:
>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/26217.html
>
>"Service providers are also required to keep customer records, including
>emails, for 90 days, under the bill." "The bill has to go to Senate,
>where it is expected to receive little opposition, before becoming law."
Are you reacting to the contents of the bill (bill number?) or to the
interpretations of a reporter?
Could someone please cite the 90 days requirement in an actual bill? Not
saying it's not there, but the bills I could find through Thomas don't seem
to have any mention of this. I'm not calling my senators until I have
precise citations.
>Talk to your senators folks. See if they're going to pay for the disk
>arrays required to store 90 days worth of SPAM for each and every one of
>your customers.
>
>I suggest that congress get the spammers under control prior to enacting
>legislation that requires us to archive all email for 90 days.
>
>---
>John Fraizer | High-Security Datacenter Services |
>EnterZone, Inc | Dedicated circuits 64k - 155M OC3 |
>http://www.enterzone.net/ | Virtual, Dedicated, Colocation |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie dts@senie.com
Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
