[50083] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Thu Jul 18 11:51:59 2002
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:48:58 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
Cc: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>,
Rob Healey <rhealey@onvoy.com>, "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0207181126190.3160-100000@NEON.hq.nac.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
it appears to depend upon which hemisphere you get transit in :)
Steve
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
> Hmm.
>
> We don't filter, and
>
> 112942 network entries and 391859 paths using 25288182 bytes of memory
>
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> >
> > without filtering?
> >
> > about 135k prefies last i checked.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:38:48PM -0500, Rob Healey wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > How big is the global BGP table running these days?
> > >
> > > 100K? 110K? Bigger?
> > >
> > > -Rob
> >
> > --
> > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
>
>
>
