[50081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Thu Jul 18 11:27:13 2002
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:26:39 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
Cc: Rob Healey <rhealey@onvoy.com>,
"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020717214325.GK3796@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hmm.
We don't filter, and
112942 network entries and 391859 paths using 25288182 bytes of memory
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> without filtering?
>
> about 135k prefies last i checked.
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 04:38:48PM -0500, Rob Healey wrote:
> >
> >
> > How big is the global BGP table running these days?
> >
> > 100K? 110K? Bigger?
> >
> > -Rob
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
