[48963] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Thu Jun 20 11:35:21 2002
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
To: "Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell@hosting.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <593552EB08E7D411902F0002A52C7BBED1323B@hnmdexc01.hosting.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring bandwidth by IP? My
> original thought was 1 switch port = 1 IP, but in the case of virtual IP's
> on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more and more of a
virtual ip's == nats? all ip addresses are real ip addresses.
> demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can bill their customer
> accordingly.
>
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> Dan Mitchell
> Internet Systems Engineer - Boston
> AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com
> 781.478.1857 Direct Line
> dan.mitchell@hosting.com
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli Academic User Services joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu
-- PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E --
In Dr. Johnson's famous dictionary patriotism is defined as the last
resort of the scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened but
inferior lexicographer I beg to submit that it is the first.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
