[48962] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniska Tomas)
Thu Jun 20 11:29:40 2002
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:26:33 +0200
From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
you will get the accounting cache exhausted soon if you don't poll&clean =
it frequently...
--
=20
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
=20
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by =
blowing first.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.Nether.net]=20
> Sent: 20. j=FAna 2002 17:17
> To: Mitchell, Dan
> Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
> Subject: Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
>=20
>=20
>=20
> interface (gig|fast)ethernet1/0
> ip account mac (in|out)
> =09
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 08:48:34AM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> >=20
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring=20
> bandwidth by IP? My
> > original thought was 1 switch port =3D 1 IP, but in the case=20
> of virtual IP's
> > on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more=20
> and more of a
> > demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can=20
> bill their customer
> > accordingly.
> >=20
> > Any recommendations?
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >=20
> > Dan Mitchell
> > Internet Systems Engineer - Boston
> > AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com
> > 781.478.1857 Direct Line
> > dan.mitchell@hosting.com
>=20
> --=20
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements=20
> are only mine.
>=20
