[47952] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "portscans" (was Re: Arbor Networks DoS defense product)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Francis)
Sun May 19 04:03:17 2002

Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 00:57:52 -0700
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20020519075752.GD70173@darkuncle.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>,
	Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205190004350.9389-100000@sasami.anime.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:12:01AM -0700, goemon@anime.net said:
[snip]
> And what the critics keep missing is that it will take several landmine=
=20
> hits across the internet to invoke a blackhole. Just scanning a few=20
> individual hosts or /24s won't do it.
>=20
> There are three aims of the landmine project:
>=20
> 1) early warning
> 2) defensive response
> 3) deterrence
>=20
> I realize such a project won't be absolutely, positively perfect in every=
=20
> aspect, and it won't satisfy 100% of the people 100% of the time. But=20
> that's hardly an excuse to not do it. IMO the positives outweigh the=20
> negatives by far.

This is what I have been (unsuccessfully) attempting to state. I apparently
need more practice in being coherent. :)
--=20
Scott Francis                   darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager          sfrancis@ [work:]         t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7              illum oportet crescere me autem minui

--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=C7QL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post