[47905] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interconnects
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Fri May 17 19:57:23 2002
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-reply-to: ralph's message of Fri, 17 May 2002 08:00:15 -0400.
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0205170758500.13089-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 08:47:09 +0900
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
Message-Id: <20020517234710.0D0CD7BA@starfruit.itojun.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
(sorry if you see it twice)
>> >A bunch of us are thinking about multihoming solutions for IPv6. For this
>> >purpose, it is useful to know a bit more about how actual networks (rather
>> >than the ones existing only as ASCII drawings) interconnect. So:
>> >
>> >- What are the 12 - 18 most important interconnect locations in the world?
>> > MAE East, the Ameritech, Sprint and PacBell NAPs, PAIX, LINX and AMS-IX
>> > come to mind, but from where I'm sitting it's hard to judge whether
>> > others are important or marginal.
NSPIXP6 (tokyo) has the largest number of participants (40+).
6TAP, NY6IX, 6IIX-NY, and PAIX palo alto comes to my mind next.
check out http://www.v6nap.net/.
>> >- Using private or public interconnects?
both. there are a lot of private interconnections over tunnel, which
should be changed to CAT5 cable.
itojun
