[47902] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interconnects
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Kent)
Fri May 17 19:03:29 2002
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205172301.g4HN1q1T043254@noc.mainstreet.net>
From: Mark Kent <mark@noc.mainstreet.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-reply-to: <200205172247.WAA03842@vacation.karoshi.com>
(bmanning@karoshi.com)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
>> I would expect that if the Equinix exchange participants were IPv6
>> hungry ...
Let me toss in a question that may really be dumb... what are those
that are hungry for IPV6 doing with it?
I figure that organizations that run IPV6 now think they are
ahead of the game. Are they? Is this something that responsible
ISPs should be doing?
Would this turn our network into one big NAT area when we have to
translate into IPV4 addresses at the edge to get to the real Internet?
-mark
!bankrupt, hence !Tier1
