[47642] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ratios
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Wed May 8 11:04:46 2002
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 16:04:05 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: Dean S Moran <dmoran@supernetpower.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, peter.jansen@cw.net, scott@graphidelix.net
In-Reply-To: <265002002538141456453@supernetpower.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205081603400.11355-100000@staff.opaltelecom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> It's a great big catch-22 any way you look at it, and I hate you, Peter
> Jansen, for it. There's a special level of hell for people like you when
> you die.
a little harsh ;)
>
> Dean
>
> >Regards
> >
> >Peter Jansen
> >Global Peering
> >Cable & Wireless
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:30 -0400 (EDT)
> >From: Scott Granados <scott@graphidelix.net>
> >To: nanog@merit.edu
> >Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
> >Delivered-to: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
> >Delivered-to: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu
> >Delivered-to: nanog@merit.edu
> >Subject: ratios
> >
> >
> >I'm not overly familiar with this but I wondered if someone could detail
> >for me the basics of using ratios to determine elegibility to peer? I
> >have heard that some carrers especially the largest require a specific
> >ratio is this in fact true and is the logic as simple as just insuring
> >equal use of the peer?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Scott
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
> http://www.MyOwnEmail.com
>
>
