[47622] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ratios
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Tue May 7 20:46:56 2002
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 00:45:33 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Scott Granados <scott@graphidelix.net>
Cc: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205071725260.32027-100000@penguin.graphidelix.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0205080039410.28808-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
SG> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
SG> From: Scott Granados
SG> Someone in this case could create false traffic either pull
SG> or push probably most likely pull and meet the ratio but
It almost encourages those with eyeballs to spam, no? Maybe
that's how [names deleted] meet their ratios... adjust how
quickly they sign up and kick spammers. ;-)
SG> cause drastic amounts of useless traffic to be carried on
SG> the backbone. This does create far worse problems. I'd
SG> assume such a method could be determined if not done properly
You mean, like someone binding many IPs across geographically
diverse locations and replaying cache traces? (Pretty sick when
interconnects are reduced to the same level as people cheating
those make-money-with-each-site-you-visit programs...)
SG> but still it seems that these policies whether relating to ip
SG> allocation or ratio of traffic leads to more harm than good.
Yup.
--
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
