[47612] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ratios
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Parker)
Tue May 7 18:08:45 2002
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020507165927.03511e98@mailc>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 17:05:27 -0500
To: PETER JANSEN <peter.jansen@cw.net>
From: Chris Parker <cparker@starnetusa.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <0GVR00I06GON58@cw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 05:50 PM 5/7/2002 -0400, PETER JANSEN wrote:
>Scott:
>
> Ratios are normally applied to either direction, since it is not
>totally understood who benefits from what traffic direction. Who benefits:
>the eyball or the content provider???
I would say that both, which is why I personally feel that ratios are
misapplied in a lot of instances.
( Some providers feel that it benefits neither the eyeball or the content
provider to peer, they would like both to pay them for transit )
BTW Peter, thanks for killing our peering sessions. I guess our eyeballs
were of no benefit to your content providers? *shrug*
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
\ ~ ~ / \ WX *is* Wireless! \ Director, Engineering
| @ @ | \ http://www.starnetwx.net \ (847) 963-0116
oOo---(_)---oOo--\------------------------------------------------------
\ Wholesale Internet Services - http://www.megapop.net
