[47589] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon May 6 19:50:23 2002
Message-Id: <200205062341.g46NfnQn027960@foo-bar-baz.cc.vt.edu>
To: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 May 2002 19:31:47 EDT."
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0205061928390.627-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_928347284P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 19:41:49 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_928347284P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 06 May 2002 19:31:47 EDT, Ralph Doncaster said:
> 99+% of SPAM. i.e. the first email from a particular remote server that
> is received, requires the sender to take some action (respond with a
And the mailing list you just subscribed to clicks on the URL *how*?
Across the hall we got a large Sun box that does some 2M POP3 checks
per week, for a 70K+ user community. Explain how your scheme works in that
environment....
OK.. said throw-away dialup tosses one piece of mail, has a little proggie
that catches the response and automates the reply, and then proceeds to
spam my 70K users. Wow, that slowed them down a lot. ;)
--==_Exmh_928347284P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE81xS8cC3lWbTT17ARAj5IAKCcmixCKuhjBqSYkagBuHw+arbP5ACeL89q
T2UHABFCKI67BM1FB8QxWyc=
=PcuJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_928347284P--
