[47602] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Francis)
Tue May 7 14:43:16 2002

Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 11:40:42 -0700
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>
To: Mike Joseph <mjoseph@netaxs.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, dkk@mit.edu
Message-ID: <20020507184042.GD1954@darkuncle.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>,
	Mike Joseph <mjoseph@netaxs.com>, nanog@nanog.org, dkk@mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSU.4.21.0205070108260.4388-100000@access.netaxs.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



--gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:13:34AM -0400, mjoseph@netaxs.com said:
[snip]
> The major problem I see with this is the need to verify that the
> spamvertised site actually requested or paid for the spam.  After all,
> what's to prevent me from spamming in the name of xyz.com just so I can
> see them shutdown?  More importantly, you need evidence to shut a customer
> and being spamvertised alone is not necessarily sufficient.

Obviously, there is still a need for some investigation during the spam
tracking process. I'm sure this kind of thing happens, but I think the vast
majority of spamvertised sites really are the source of the spam. It goes
without saying that there is no substitute for clue, both in the spam
fighting arena and elsewhere.

> -Mike

--=20
Scott Francis                   darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u n c l e . n e t
Systems/Network Manager          sfrancis@ [work:]         t o n o s . c o m
GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7              illum oportet crescere me autem minui

--gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=1Kgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post