[47377] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Thu May 2 19:57:42 2002
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.com>
Cc: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>,
Peter Bierman <pmb+nanog@sfgoth.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020502164153.0215ee78@oak.higgs.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205021656040.2045-100000@sasami.anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Simon Higgs wrote:
> At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:
> >The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a
> >publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell phone
> >needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.
> I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My current phone
> does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of analog-type
> services?
The average customer doesn't even know what telnet is, let alone ssh.
All they care about is browsing pr0n.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
