[47376] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mansey, Jon)
Thu May 2 19:52:55 2002
Message-ID: <43CAA8BAF8A21049B3ABF1A70AED597532EE9B@laxexg01.la.interpacket.net>
From: "Mansey, Jon" <Jon_Mansey@verestar.com>
To: 'Simon Higgs' <simon@higgs.com>,
Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>
Cc: Peter Bierman <pmb+nanog@sfgoth.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:52:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Why do you need a public IP to do ssh?
jm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Higgs [mailto:simon@higgs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: Scott Francis
> Cc: Peter Bierman; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
>
>
>
> At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:
>
> >The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a
> >publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell
> >phone needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.
>
> I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My
> current phone
> does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of
> analog-type
> services?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Simon
>
> --
> ###
>
