[47207] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniska Tomas)
Mon Apr 29 12:37:25 2002
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:36:32 +0200
Message-ID: <A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A0712841D@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>
From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
To: "Beckmeyer" <beck@pacbell.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
jb,
i've seen this as a part of turnkey solution by one of gprs vendors. =
they made two service classes - generic (10.0.0.0/8-based with nat) and =
'privileged' - with registered addresses. and it was not only a =
slideware but a real installation
but then you have many other large-scale issues like access =
acceleration, content optimization etc...
--
=20
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
=20
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by =
blowing first.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beckmeyer [mailto:beck@pacbell.net]=20
> Sent: 29. apr=EDla 2002 18:08
> To: tme@multicasttech.com; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Marshall et al,
>=20
> It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave - 10's of=20
> thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short=20
> order it will=20
> be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm willing to=20
> think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful of "POPs".
>=20
> The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each Internet=20
> connected user or some major subset of them will likely wind=20
> up with an=20
> address on their mobile device. =20
>=20
> - JB
>=20
>=20
