[47206] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Mon Apr 29 12:27:22 2002
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: Beckmeyer <beck@pacbell.net>, tme@multicasttech.com,
nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:26:49 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1347495@multicasttech.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CCD6FF0.1040404@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:08:16 -0700
Beckmeyer <beck@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> Marshall et al,
>
Dear JB;
1.) Dare I suggest that you use IPv6 ? It should make a
great NAT.
2.) If you are interested in having content put on your
wireless devices I would like to talk off line.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave
> - 10's of
> thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short
> order it will
> be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm
> willing to
> think in terms of 10's of thousands spread over a handful
> of "POPs".
>
> The application is GPRS (aka 2.5/3G cellular) and each
> Internet
> connected user or some major subset of them will likely
> wind up with an
> address on their mobile device.
>
> - JB
>
