[46834] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: genuity - any good?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Fri Apr 12 14:12:52 2002
In-Reply-To: <3CB6EC79.5DABCF24@garlic.com> from Roy at "Apr 12, 2002 07:17:29 am"
To: garlic@garlic.com (Roy)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:08:27 +0100 (BST)
Cc: matthew@velvet.org (matthew zeier),
nanog@merit.edu (nanog@merit.edu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20020412180827.6F6133F06B@equinox.DOMINO.ORG>
From: neil@DOMINO.ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> 1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register
> each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any
> reasonable route for your prefixes. According to one of their top people,
> prefix-lists were unreliable new technology. We gave up and canceled the
> circuit.
Man I don't know of a provider that doesn't do this - but the
fact is this is a good thing.
