[46600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Apr 5 21:35:00 2002
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:34:11 -0500
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20020406023411.GB28076@puck.nether.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020406004859.GC92813@ewok.creative.net.au>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Some providers even use /31s on peering interfaces
if the other side can also. Most modern router software
supports this feature.
- jared
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:48:59AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any
> PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy
> with?
>
> If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on
> IPv4 Point-to-Point Links"
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd "For a sucessful technology, reality must
> <adrian@creative.net.au> take precedence over public relations,
> for nature cannot be fooled" - Feynmann
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
