|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-Id: <200204060130.UAA09757@elektra.ultra.net> In-Reply-To: <20020406004859.GC92813@ewok.creative.net.au> from Adrian Chadd at "Apr 6, 2002 08:48:59 am" To: nanog@merit.edu Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 20:30:30 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu In the referenced message, Adrian Chadd said: > > Hi all, > > Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any > PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy > with? > > If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on > IPv4 Point-to-Point Links" > > Thanks, > Adrian Yes, and it works wonderfully. The only issue is (for me) getting around the thought that even=low and odd=high, vs the case where odd=low and even=high. For example, when I'm on a router, look at an interface, and want to ping the other end, I have to get out of years of autopilot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |