[45855] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Palmer (NANOG Acct))
Tue Feb 26 08:45:31 2002
Message-ID: <007501c1becb$78a5e0e0$8101a8c0@TAKA>
From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog@adns.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:42:14 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
What right does the government have in preventing people from having
multiple domains and trading/selling them? Thats none of your (or)
the government's business.
----- Original Message -----
From: <vince@penguin-power.com>
To: "Vadim Antonov" <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
>
>
> > 4) exponential fee increments for registering domains with the same
> > payer's physical address and/or name.
>
> Yeah so I don't like this suggestion at all. What if a company has several
business units each with its own domain name, with the same address, and
with a shared accounting department. Or an ISP that offers to pay for its
customers domain if they prepay for a year. Or someone like me who owns
several domains?
> Nope I really dont' like this suggestion, the other ones seem to be more
thought out.
>
> -Vince
>
>
